
The Growing PFAS Focus in Europe and the UK – Strategies for Life Sciences Companies
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances – which are widely used across industries and in life sciences applications, from cosmetics and food-contact-material to medical devices and pharmaceuticals – have become an increasing focus of regulatory scrutiny across Europe. In the EU, broad legislative measures aim at restricting the manufacture, placing on the market, and use of PFAS across a wide range of industries, resulting in industry and policy consequences. In contrast, the United Kingdom is considering more targeted regulatory approaches, signaling a potential divergence from the EU framework. The life sciences sector is particularly affected by these developments, given its historic reliance on PFAS in discovery, development, manufacturing, packaging, delivery, and safe use of medicines and healthcare products. These substances are often used for safety and performance reasons, e.g., in diagnostic assays and implantable medical devices, and play a key role in many pharmaceutical manufacturing processes. While carve-outs are likely to apply for certain uses, a broad legislative measure will undoubtfully have sweeping consequences for the life sciences industry. This blog post examines the evolving European regulatory landscape and considers the implications of forthcoming PFAS restrictions for businesses operating in the life sciences sector in Europe.
A More Competitive MedTech Landscape in the EU? What the MDR/IVDR Revision Could Mean for MedTech Manufacturers and Investors
The EU’s targeted revision of the medical device and in vitro diagnostics framework has entered a more active phase, with nearly 800 amendments tabled in Parliament in July 2026 and the Council’s examination continuing in parallel. The revision would ease certification bottlenecks by removing the five-year cap on certificate validity, scaling notified body involvement to device risk, and letting lower-risk software move down to self-certified Class I. It would also loosen clinical evidence requirements, create fast-track pathways for orphan and breakthrough devices, and regulate AI-enabled devices primarily under the MDR/IVDR rather than the AI Act. This post summarizes the key aspects of the proposed revision, the prospects for their adoption, the issues still in play, and what manufacturers and investors should plan for.

2025 to First-Half 2026 Marks a Breakout Time for CVRs
Sally Wagner Partin and Sharon Flanagan look at the results of Sidley’s latest survey of contingent value rights (“CVRs”), analyzing recent trends in life sciences public M&A and finding a record share of deals using a CVR, particularly in biopharma and also increasingly in medical devices.

